Canadian Democracy in a North American Assignment

Canadian Democracy in a North American - Assignment Example Quebec being the only province in Canada that speaks French, the two professors try to identify the laws that affect Quebec and how relevant these laws are to the French population. To try and support the province, they analyze ways in which the province can be recognized in the Constitution of Canada without any trouble. This would, however, require amendments that will not only require the expertise of the legislation but will also have to be passed by a majority of votes in the other provinces. Is it necessary for Quebec to have its own language and hence promote their rich French culture? Body Quebec has always had a rich history in French culture and language. However, the other parts of the country speak English and do not have the rich French culture that exists in Quebec. Preserving the French culture has always proved to be a problem and as a result of this, the leaders have come with amendments that will allow each province to be able to determine some issues affecting them without having to affect other provinces. For example in this case, Quebec could be able to change its laws and make French the official language in the province unlike other provinces which have English being their official language. However, it will mean that the constitution will have to be amended to allow each province to choose its respective language without legislative opposition. The bilateral constitution amendments process has to be limited to only a few issues and should not include issues that are critical to the country’s security and economy such as voting periods. At the moment, however, it is not possible for any province to amend its constitution without legislative approval. The process began in 1982 when the country adopted a new constitutional amendment process that ensures that Canada changes its constitution without the inclusion of the British. It has, however, been argued that during this period, the amendments were made without the approval of Quebe c – a major province that had over a quarter of the entire population at that particular period of time. This was ironical since Quebec had played a major role in ensuring that Canada got these amendments. However, the country’s legislature completely ignored the agenda that Quebec had for this particular change. After this, there have been several failed attempts to accept the changes that Quebec proposes to the constitution. The main arguments of the authors are that Quebec has always had a rich French culture that has always been protected by the people all through the years. The people, therefore, need these cultural values that include the French language to be protected by law. This would mean that French becomes the official language of the province. However, currently the law does not recognize the bilateral amendment process. The authors argue that in 1982, Quebec fought for a new constitution that would allow the country to amend its own constitution without Britain’s help. Quebec also proposed the inclusion of bilateral constitution amendment, a system that would allow each province to change some of its laws that did not include controversial statements that were important to the country. However, during the constitutional amendment process, Quebec was not included in the process and some of its needs were not met. Despite the constant complaints by the Quebec leaders, there has not been a consensus on how to promote culture in the area. It is important to

Employers and Employees rights :: Business and Management Studies

Employers and Employees rights INTRODUCTION: In this piece of course work I am going to describe, using examples from Shropshire county council, the rights of the employer and its employees. I am also going to explain using examples of how the they resolve the disagreements with its employees over rights of employment or working conditions. Then I am going to evaluate the extent to which Shropshire ensures that a good working relationship exist between the employers and employees. 1. Describe the employer and employee rights of the business you have investigated in detail and give examples. We as employers and employees at Shropshire county council are protected by numerous amount of laws Some of these laws are: Equal pay act 1963 This allows us as employees to get a fair share in pay. This act will enable us to take legal action against Shropshire if we feel and have proof of not getting the right amount of pay that should be permitted. Not only does this act helps us as employees it also helps our employers. The directors of Shropshire county council employ the employers that employ us, so they too are considered to be employees. Race relation act 1976 This act allows us both as employees and employers to be treated fairly. This act has to do with the discrimination against our race or religion. It enables us to take legal actions against Shropshire if we feel and have proof of unfair treatment of our race and religion. Pregnancy and Discrimination act This act is here for both the employees and employers if we are fired or discriminated because of being pregnant. This will allow us to get compensation. If fired this will also allow us to also get our job back at Shropshire. Health and Safety act This is there for both we the employees and our employers. Not only are we protected by this act we are also responsible for the health and safety for the other members of staff. E.g. in the computer rooms we must act responsible for not permitted to smoke in non-smoking areas, if done this could affect other members of staff. 2. State how the business resolves its disagreements with employees in connection with employment and working conditions. When disputes occur at Shropshire the management will try to follow the correct procedure. Wherever possible the issue is dealt with by managers within the council. There are clear procedures to follow, which will be carefully followed. E.g. if a member of staff was discriminated by one of his or her co-workers with proof the staff member could bring it to a union representative

Critical Evaluation: Frankenstein Essay

Frankenstein Mary Shelley creates strong meaning through her interpretation a monster by the main concept. Bringing something back from the dead is what created the mystery and curiosity for this lost soul. The idea of this impossibility is what has made it recognised today. Mary Shelley had conceived the idea for Frankenstein in a time of wonder. She uses imagery and strategic repetition of key descriptive words to create an atmosphere of horror and gloom in the first part of the chapter, when the monster comes to life. Shelley invites readers to believe Victor’s story through an objective person. Shelley also uses an important literary device known as the epistolary form — where letters tell the story — using letters between Walton and his sister to frame both Victor’s and the creature’s narrative. She uses imagery and strategic repetition of key descriptive words to create an atmosphere of horror and gloom in the first part of the chapter, when the monster comes to life. She uses variations of words such as â€Å"dreary†, â€Å"horrid†, â€Å"disgust†, â€Å"miserable†, and â€Å"wretched† liberally, and paints vivid images of ugliness and decay. Frankenstein was deeply described as a monster that should not deserve the advantage of having a female companion through his life. The experiences which led Frankenstein understand the way the world perceives those who are different were unfortunately not the way they thought they would be. Within the book Frankenstein has a section where he speaks in first person narrative so that he can present his won perspective of the situation. Harmony was the soul of our companionship,† is an example of personification to the concept. Shelley uses the issues of being different to influence the way the audience feels towards the monster and his brutal murders. Meaning is exposed to the way Frankenstein really feels. His vulnerability is shown when he reveals that â€Å"it tort ured my heart† when he killed these innocent people. An understanding can also be gathered and influenced by the personalities and wishes of both Frankenstein and Victor. At first Victor’s mistake was to create this being of horror. It portrayed Frankenstein as the monster when actually Victor is refusing him of the only thing he wants and needs to live through this life which was not his choice to live. Mary Shelley guides you through the life of the creator and the creator’s created. Shelley gives the audience the change to make up their own mind of who caused the wrong doings by giving using different language techniques to give you an explanation on both sides. Why is it Valued? Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is so very valued because of the imagination which is depicted through the concept of life after death. Frankenstein is recognised worldwide because of his kind heart in such a sad life. Even though he is seen as positively repulsive Frankenstein still finds joy in seeing others act like a family and learning from their experiences in life. Frankenstein is cherished because of its shocking concept. Frankenstein was brought into the world without a second’s thought to what the consequences would be. It has captured audiences in our generation and generations to come for its passionate personalities and imaginary themes.

The Legal Status Of The Human Body - 1448 Words

In our present bio-medical age, with the advancement of technology, the legal definitions of ‘persons’ and ‘property’ have begun to endanger what it means to be classified as a human. From organ donation, to surrogacy, and the research done on bodily fluids and tissues, the human body is slowly becoming the property of the state rather than the property of the person. In order to combat this legal status there needs to an expansion of the property rights of legal persons, which would have to encompass their body, including all by-products that the body produces. Michael Sandel, a professor at Harvard, has identified two arguments surrounding the idea of surrogacy that can also be applied to organ donation or other areas of medicine and†¦show more content†¦In our society the process of selling and buying children, body parts and their by-products will always seem morally corrupt even if the law changes to support that market. These two arguments help to show the problem with the purchase and sale of children in relation to surrogacy. Sandel argues that a pregnant mother cannot voluntarily enter into a contract to give her unborn child away once birthed because she is unlikely to be fully informed of all the consequences and details. Sandel goes on to say that treating a child as a commodity degrades them because they are now used as a form of profit. Based on Sandel’s two arguments, when an issue arises over the products or processes of a human body there can be no way in which the transaction could take place in an entirely voluntary matter. One party will always be at a disadvantage in one way or another and societal norms will not allow for transactions, where there appears to be no disadvantage present, to take place. Sandel’s arguments can be seen during the appeal trial of the famous Baby M case, but in the initial trial, adjudicated by Justice Sorkow, the reasoning behind the judgement takes the opposite approach of Sandel’s arguments. Justice Sorkow based his decision in the trial partially on the fact that the surrogate consciously chose to have a child for another couple. Justice Sorkow reasons that the